The Canonization of the Bible

• Progressive collection of authoritative scriptures

• Written by recognized anointed men of God such as prophets and apostles.

• Recognized and accepted as authoritative by the community of God's people

We need to remind ourselves that no one person or council made a book 'scripture.' God's church through a process over time came to a common recognition which books were indeed inspired.

A. The Old Testament Canon

When the phrase 'the Law' or ‘the Law and prophets' is used, it denotes that which is accepted as authoritative among God's people. By referring to this twofold reference we know that all the present OT books were included. The closely knit Jewish community always accepted these books as divine down to today. Jesus did too.

(1) Daniel 9:26 shows that the two divisions was already accepted by the exile.

Moreover, we have not listened to Thy servants the prophets, who spoke in Thy name to our kings, our princes, our fathers, and all the people of the land. (Daniel 9:6)

(2) This twofold categorization is made ten times in the New Testament.

On these two commandments depend the whole Law and the Prophets. (Matthew 22:40)

... And he was explaining to them by solemnly testifying about the kingdom of God, and trying to persuade them concerning Jesus, from both the Law of Moses and from the Prophets, from morning until evening. (Acts 28:23)

There is no evidence that any authoritative books were accepted among the original books after 400 BC. The Spirit of God had departed from Israel and the continuity of the prophetic line ceased to be. The intertestamental time (400 BC to Christ's time) continued to confirm the same Law and Prophets.

B. The New Testament Canon

The process of canonization for the New Testament is similar to the Old even though the circumstances widely differed.

While the Old Testament was kept confined largely to the Israelite community protected by the temple and the priests, the New Testament was literally spread out across the world through the Greek copies and different language translations.

Christians were wondering which books should they teach, which would they die for and what books taught the truth. Cults produced their own set of books. A heretic named Marcion in the second century AD said that only Luke and ten of Paul' s epistles should be part of the New Testament. This forced the church to formerly recognize which books really were authentically scripture.

We know more of the process of canonization for the New Testament because of many secondary documents. That having been said, the process was similar to the Old Testament. Canonization happened over periods of time as the community of God's people became familiar with the different books and got copies of them. For example, some books were written to certain places such as Rome (Romans) or even to individuals (Gaius in 3 John). It would take a good amount of time before the document circled back to Antioch, Jerusalem and the other Christian communities. Those books that were questioned were often excluded from one part of the church.

Note how Colossians 4:16 describes how the book was to be passed around.

And when this letter is read among you, have it also read in the church of the Laodiceans; and you, for your part read my letter that is coming from Laodicea.